专题:生物多样性保护研究与国家公园建设

生物多样性保护与可持续发展背景下的生态安全

  • 郑舒元 ,
  • 刘国华 ,
  • 万凌凡 ,
  • 赵俊彦 ,
  • 李佳佳 ,
  • 左玲丽 ,
  • 苏旭坤
展开
  • 1. 云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院, 昆明 650504;
    2. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;
    3. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049
郑舒元,博士研究生,研究方向为区域生态,电子信箱:zhengshuyuan@stu.ynu.edu.cn;苏旭坤(通信作者),副研究员,研究方向为生物多样性保护与生态安全,电子信箱:xksu@rcees.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2024-08-02

  修回日期: 2024-08-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-17

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重大项目(72394401)

Progress in ecological security research in the context of biodiversity and sustainable development

  • ZHENG Shuyuan ,
  • LIU Guohua ,
  • WAN Lingfan ,
  • ZHAO Junyan ,
  • LI Jiajia ,
  • ZUO Lingli ,
  • SU Xukun
Expand
  • 1. Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
    3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2024-08-02

  Revised date: 2024-08-30

  Online published: 2024-10-17

摘要

总结了生态安全与生物多样性及可持续发展的关系,以及生态安全研究的发展方向。分析表明,生态安全研究的时效性与动态性存在不足,同时在生态安全评价体系与评价因子无明确定义的背景下,不同保护对象在复杂生态系统中的表现与作用难以兼顾,故对于生态安全评估的效果与预期存在较大偏差。因此,建议在生态安全评价研究中引入生态敏感性、生态脆弱性与生态重要性的研究策略,进一步明确生态保护实体与对象,提高生态安全评价的时效性,紧扣生态系统复杂作用过程,加强风险评估管理。同时,建议进一步完善生态安全评价指标体系与评价方法,综合考虑生态敏感性、生态脆弱性与生态重要性的作用与功能以及结合多种未来情景,进行生态安全空间变化趋势预测,以期进一步为生物多样性保护与可持续发展的现实决策提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

郑舒元 , 刘国华 , 万凌凡 , 赵俊彦 , 李佳佳 , 左玲丽 , 苏旭坤 . 生物多样性保护与可持续发展背景下的生态安全[J]. 科技导报, 2024 , 42(18) : 46 -57 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2024.08.01041

Abstract

Given the exponential growth of the global population and the advancements in socio-economic development, ecological security has emerged as a pivotal factor for both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development strategies. Thus, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the relationship among ecological security, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development, as well as the future directions of ecological security research. Due to the lack of clearly defined ecological security assessment systems and evaluation factors, reconciling diverse conservation objectives within intricate ecosystems poses a formidable challenge, resulting in substantial disparities between anticipated and actual ecological security assessments. To address these challenges, the integration of research strategies focusing on ecological sensitivity, vulnerability, and importance is proposed to be included into the assessment of ecological security. This approach aims to enhance the clarity of conservation entities and targets, improve the timeliness of ecological security evaluations, and strengthen risk assessment and management by establishing close links with complex ecosystem processes. Furthermore, this research critically examines the current research methods and presents future prospects for investigation in terms of improving the selection of indices and evaluation methods for ecological security. It aims to overcome traditional approaches by comprehensively considering the roles and functions of ecological sensitivity, ecological vulnerability, and ecological importance. Additionally, it seeks to predict spatial trends in ecological security by incorporating various future scenarios. This aims to provide practical decision-making references for the conservation of biodiversity and the promotion of sustainable development.

参考文献

[1] Persson Å, Weitz N, Nilsson M. Follow-up and review of the sustainable development goals: Alignment vs. internalization[J]. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 2016, 25(1): 59-68.
[2] Cheshmehzangi A, Dawodu A. The review of sustainable development goals (SDGs): People, perspective and planning[M]//Sustainable Urban Development in the Age of Climate Change. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018: 133-156.
[3] Zhang S, Zhou Y Q, Yu R, et al. China's biodiversity conservation in the process of implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 338: 130595.
[4] Liu G H. Formation and evolution mechanism of ecological security pattern in Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7088-7091.
[5] 陈星, 周成虎. 生态安全: 国内外研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(6): 8-20.
[6] 苏飞, 应蓉蓉, 张慧敏, 等. 可持续性科学研究热点及其知识基础: 以Sustainability Science载文数据为例[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(9): 2764-2772.
[7] 尹晓波. 我国可持续发展生态安全面临的挑战及对策[J]. 计划与市场探索, 2003(2): 24-26.
[8] 崔胜辉, 洪华生, 黄云凤, 等. 生态安全研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2005(4): 861-868.
[9] 马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础[J]. 生态学报, 2004(4): 761-768.
[10] 肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002(3): 354-358.
[11] 黄备, 邵君波, 孟伟杰, 等. 利用PSR模型的椒江河口生态系统环境质量评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(6): 825-831.
[12] 曲艺, 陆明. 生物多样性保护视角下的城市生态安全格局构建研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(4): 134-137.
[13] 董文渊, 王逸之. 生态保护红线划定对云南生物多样性保护影响研究[J]. 环境科学导刊, 2015, 34(6): 18-21.
[14] Rosenstock T S, Lamanna C, Chesterman S, et al. When less is more: Innovations for tracking progress toward global targets[J]. Current Opinion In Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 26-27: 54-61.
[15] Dizdaroglu D. The role of indicator-based sustainability assessment in policy and the decision-making process: A review and outlook[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(6): 1018.
[16] 吕永龙, 王一超, 苑晶晶, 等. 关于中国推进实施可持续发展目标的若干思考[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(1): 1-9.
[17] 陈军, 彭舒, 赵学胜, 等. 顾及地理空间视角的区域SDGs综合评估方法与示范[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(4): 473-479.
[18] Kanter D R, Schwoob M H, Baethgen W E, et al. Translating the Sustainable Development Goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways[J]. Global Food Security, 2016, 10: 71-79.
[19] Weise K, Hofer R, Franke J, et al. Wetland extent tools for SDG 6.6.1 reporting from the Satellite-based Wetland Observation Service (SWOS)[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 247: 111892.
[20] 王一超. 基于多源数据融合的可持续发展目标监测与评估研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(2): 181-192.
[21] Clemencon R. Is sustainable development bad for global biodiversity conservation?[J]. Global Sustainability, 2021, 4: e16.
[22] 郭传友, 王中生, 方炎明. 外来种入侵与生态安全[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003(2): 73-78.
[23] Zhu B, Hashimoto S, Cushman S A. Navigating ecological security research over the last 30 years: A scoping review[J]. Sustainability Science, 2023, 18(5): 2485-2498.
[24] Ehrenfeld J G, Scott N. Invasive species and the soil: Effects on organisms and ecosystem processes 1[J]. Ecological Applications, 2001, 11(5): 1259-1260.
[25] 张洁瑜, 马克明. 湿地生态安全格局设计与生物多样性保护[C]. 中国科学院生物多样性委员会、国家环境保护总局自然生态保护司、国家林业局野生动植物保护司、教育部科技司、国家海洋局环境保护司, 2002: 1.
[26] 李文杰, 张时煌. GIS和遥感技术在生态安全评价与生物多样性保护中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6674-6681.
[27] 刘前媛, 李云鹏. 生物多样性保护视角下成都平原经济区生态安全格局构建[C]. 中国城市规划学会, 2023: 10.
[28] 尹晓波. 区域可持续发展的生态安全评价[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2003(7): 139-144.
[29] 蒋树芳, 胡宝清, 郑峰. 桂西石山区可持续发展的生态安全评价及跨越式发展对策[J]. 广西师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2003(S1): 22-26.
[30] Scott G, Rajabifard A. Sustainable development and geospatial information: A strategic framework for integrating a global policy agenda into national geospatial capabilities[J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2017, 20(2): 59-76.
[31] 陈军, 任惠茹, 耿雯, 等. 基于地理信息的可持续发展目标(SDGs)量化评估[J]. 地理信息世界, 2018, 25(1): 1-7.
[32] 郭华东. 地球大数据支撑可持续发展目标报告. 2020, 中国篇[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
[33] Wang W, Feng C, Liu F, et al. Biodiversity conservation in China: A review of recent studies and practices[J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2020, 2: 100025.
[34] Zhao L, Jia K, Liu X, et al. Assessment of land degradation in Inner Mongolia between 2000 and 2020 based on remote sensing data[J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2023, 4(2): 100-111.
[35] Yuan B, Jia K, Xia M, et al. Using remote sensing data to evaluate the ecological restoration in Taiyuan from the SDGs perspective[J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2023, 16(2): 4621-4645.
[36] Liu C. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022.
[37] 应凌霄, 孔令桥, 肖燚, 等. 生态安全及其评价方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5): 1679-1692.
[38] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000(1): 10-13.
[39] Mmingwu Z, Haijiang J, Desuo C, et al. The comparative study on the ecological sensitivity analysis in Huixian karst wetland, China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2: 386-398.
[40] Birkmann J. Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2007, 7: 20-31.
[41] Cumming G S, Barnes G, Perz S, et al. An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience [J]. Ecosystems, 2005, 8(8): 975-987.
[42] 谢花林, 李秀彬. 基于GIS的农村住区生态重要性空间评价及其分区管制——以兴国县长冈乡为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 230-238.
[43] 康秀亮, 刘艳红. 生态系统敏感性评价方法研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007(33): 10569-10571.
[44] 李晖, 杨树华, 姚文璟, 等. 基于GIS的怒江流域中段生态保护重要性评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(4): 947-953.
[45] 郭怀成, 都小尚, 刘永, 等. 基于景观格局分析的区域规划环评方法[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(9): 1713-1724.
[46] 王志涛, 门明新, 崔江慧. 沽源县未利用地生态重要性空间识别及其地形梯度特征分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(2): 256-264.
[47] Happer E B, Stella J C, Fremier A K. Global sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models: A case study of riparian cottonwood population dynamics[J]. Ecological Applications, 2011, 21(4): 1225-1240.
[48] Eggermont H, Versschuren D, Audenaert L, et al. Limnological and ecological sensitivity of Rwenzori mountain lakes to climate warming[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2010, 648(1): 123-142.
[49] Jin X, Wei L, Wang Y, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: A case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Environment Development And Sustainability, 2021, 23(1): 563-590.
[50] Xu A, Hu M, Shi J, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological network in inland river basin based on circuit theory, complex network and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Gansu section of Heihe River Basin[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2024, 488: 110578.
[51] Guo S, Wang Y. Ecological security assessment based on ecological footprint approach in Hulunbeir Grassland, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health, 2019, 16(23): 4805.
[52] Wei X, Eboy O V, Xu L, et al. Ecological sensitivity of urban agglomeration in the Guanzhong Plain, China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(6): 4804.
[53] Zhang J, Wang K, Chen X, et al. Combining a fuzzy matter-element model with a geographic information system in eco-environmental sensitivity and distribution of land use planning[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, 8(4): 1206-1221.
[54] Hu X, Ma C, Huang P, et al. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on AHP-PSR method and analysis of its single parameter sensitivity and spatial autocorrelation for ecological protection-A case of Weifang City, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 125: 107464.
[55] Song G, Li Z, Yang Y, et al. Assessment of ecological vulnerability and decision-making application for prioritizing roadside ecological restoration: A method combining geographic information system, Delphi survey and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Ecolocical Indicators, 2015, 52: 57-65.
[56] Shi Y, Li J, Xie M. Evaluation of the ecological sensitivity and security of tidal flats in Shanghai[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85: 729-741.
[57] Xu Y, Liu R, Xue C, et al. Ecological sensitivity evaluation and explanatory power analysis of the giant panda national park in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109792.
[58] De Lange H J, Sala S, Vighi M, et al. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment: A review and perspectives[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2010, 408(18): 3871-3879.
[59] 杨飞, 马超, 方华军. 脆弱性研究进展: 从理论研究到综合实践[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 441-453.
[60] Morato T, Cheung W W L, Pitcher T J. Vulnerability of seamount fish to fishing: Fuzzy analysis of life‐history attributes[J]. Journal of fish Biology, 2006, 68(1): 209-221.
[61] 张学玲, 余文波, 蔡海生, 等. 区域生态环境脆弱性评价方法研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 5970-5981.
[62] 徐卫华, 欧阳志云, 王学志, 等. 汶川地震重灾区生态保护重要性评价与对策[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12):5820-5825.
[63] Du Y Y, Hu Y N, Yang Y, et al. Building ecological security patterns in southwestern mountainous areas based on ecological importance and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24): 8241-8253.
[64] 李明玉, 田丰昊, 董玉芝. 延龙图地区城市生态用地生态重要性空间识别与保护[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(12): 1870-1876.
[65] 王韩民, 郭玮, 程漱兰, 等. 国家生态安全:概念、评价及对策[J]. 管理世界, 2001(2): 149-156.
[66] Bundy A, Gomez C, Cook A M. Scrupulous proxies: Defining and applying a rigorous framework for the selection and evaluation of a suite of ecological indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 104: 737-754.
[67] Wen J, Hou K. Research on the progress of regional ecological security evaluation and optimization of its common limitations[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127: 107797.
[68] Wang W, Chen W. Study on urban land expansion evaluation index system in ecological environment security restraints[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 584-586: 474-478.
文章导航

/