为了应对当前环境研究途径隔离及忽视内在维度等问题，埃斯比约恩-哈根斯及齐默尔曼共同提出了一种整合生态学。与主流生态学、环保思潮及其他整合生态学的研究主旨不同，它以威尔伯整合理论为基础，旨在为综合处理环境问题提供一个本体论、认识论和方法论三维结合的环境研究框架及纲领，并在组织建制与实践案例上不断探索，在英美等国家产生了较大影响。埃斯比约恩-哈根斯及齐默尔曼的整合生态学的特质在于重视环境问题的内在维度、注重培养整合性生态意识及为环境综合探究提供动态思想地图，有助于推进环境问题的内在维度及综合处理等方面的探究，对中国环境问题的应对有重要启发意义。
In order to deal with the current problems of environmental research approaches such as isolation and neglect of interior dimensions, Esbjörn-Hargens and Zimmerman have jointly proposed an integral ecology which is different from the mainstream ecology, environmentalism or other theories of integral ecology. With the help of Ken Wilber's integral theory, it provides a who×how×what framework and a platform to tackle environmental problems with a three-dimensional combination of ontology, epistemology and methodology. The theory continuously explores on organization establishment and practice cases, and has a great influence on Britain and America and other countries. Its characteristics lie in paying attention to the interior dimension of environmental problems, cultivating integral ecological awareness and providing dynamic thought map for comprehensive environmental exploration. It is helpful to promote the exploration of the interior dimension and the comprehensive treatment of environmental problems.
[1] Sam Mickey, Adam Robbert, Laura Reddick. The quest for inte-gral ecology[J]. Integral Review, 2013, 9(3):11.
[2] Mickey S, Kelly S, Robbert A. The variety of integral ecolo-gies:Nature, culture, and knowledge in the planetary era[M]. Albany:State University of New York Press, 2017:1-30.
[3] 伍德沃德. 整合生态学:从分子到生态系统[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012. Guy Woodward. Integrative ecology:From molecules to ecosys-tems[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012.
[4] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Michael Zimmerman. Integral ecology:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world[M]. Boston:Shambhala Publications, Inc., 2009.
[5] Sánchez S M, Ramanathan V. Pursuit of integral ecology[J]. Sci-ence, 2016, 352(6287):747.
[6] Sam Mickey, On the verge of a planetary civilization:A philoso-phy of integral ecology[M]. London and New York:Rowman & Little Field International, Ltd., 2014:24.
[7] Darcy Riddell. Evolving approaches to conservation:Integral ecology and Canada's Great Bear Rainforest[J]. World Futures, 2005, 61(1/2):63.
[8] Sean Boyd Frye Hargens. Integral ecology:A post-metaphysi-cal approach to environmental phenomena[D]. San Francisco:California Institute of Integral Studies, 2005:1-3, 13, 106-107.
[9] 王诺. "生态整体主义"辩[J]. 读书, 2004(2):45-49. Wang Nuo. On the ecological holisms[J]. Dushu, 2004(2):45-49.
[10] 雷毅. 环境整体主义:争议与辩护[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012(3):1-6. Lei Yi. Environmental holism:Disputes and defensess[J]. Jour-nal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sci-ences Edition), 2012(3):1-6.
[11] Adrian Villasenor-Galarza. Toward an integral ecopsychology:In service of earth, psyche, and spirit[J]. Integral Review, 2013, 9(3):29.
[12] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Michael Zimmerman. An overview of integral ecology:A comprehensive approach to today's com-plex planetary issues[J]. Integral Institute-Resource Paper, 2002(2):2.
[13] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Michael Zimmerman. Integral ecology:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world[M]. Bos-ton:Shambhala Publications, Inc., 2009:186.
[14] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens. Integral ecology:The what who, and how of environmental phenomena[J]. World Futures, 2005, 61(1-2):11.
[15] 肯·威尔伯. 性、生态、灵性[M]. 李明, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2015:110. Ken Wilber. Sex, ecology, spirituality[M]. Li Ming, trans. Bei-jing:China Renmin University Press, 2015:110.
[16] Sean Boyd Frye Hargens. Integral ecology:A post-metaphysi-cal approach to environmental phenomena[D]. San Francisco:California Institute of Integral Studies, 2005:114.
[17] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens. Integral ecology:The what who, and how of environmental phenomena[J]. World Futures, 2005, 61(1-2):20-23.
[18] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Michael Zimmerman. Integral ecology:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world[M]. Bos-ton:Shambhala Publications, Inc., 2009:196.
[19] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens. Integral ecology:The what who, and how of environmental phenomena[J]. World Futures, 2005, 61(1-2):21.
[20] Sean Boyd Frye Hargens. Integral ecology:A post-metaphysi-cal approach to environmental phenomena[D]. San Francisco:California Institute of integral Studies, 2005:124.
[21] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Michael Zimmerman. Integral ecology:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world[M]. Bos-ton:Shambhala Publications, Inc., 2009:230-238.
[22] Sean Esbjörn-Hargens. Integral ecology:The what who, and how of environmental phenomena[J]. World Futures, 2005, 61(1-2):23-30.
[23] Sean Boyd Frye Hargens. Integral ecology:A post-metaphysi-cal approach to environmental phenomena[D]. San Francisco:California Institute of integral Studies, 2005:152-169.
[24] Erin Christine Moore. Integral ecology:Uniting multiple per-spectives on the natural world, Sean Esbjörn-Hargens & Mi-chael Zimmerman[J]. Ethics, Place & Environment, 2009,12(3):370.
[25] Jan Inglis. Review of integral ecology[J]. Integral Review, 2009, 5(1):167-168.
[26] Sam Mickey. Reviews[J]. Worldviews:Global Religions, Cul-ture, and Ecology, 2010, 14(2):272-274.
[27] Zachary Stein. Myth busting and metric making:Refashioning the discourse about development[J]. Integral Leadership Re-view, 2008, 8(5):1-10.
[28] Craig Chalquist. Review of integral ecology:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world by Sean Esbjörn-Hargens and Michael Zimmerman[J]. Ecopsychology, 2011, 3(2):157.
[29] Robert Greenway. Can a bigger map save us? A commentary on Esbjörn-Hargens and Michael Zimmerman's integral ecol-ogy:Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world[J]. Ecopsychology, 2011, 3(2):163.
