基于充填料浆采场流动规律和分级尾砂充填进路终态，研究了上向进路充填采矿法不同接顶率充填体的稳定性。将充填料浆采场流动分为不受限沉积扩散和受限向上堆积两个过程，结合充填料浆采场充填终态，从50%充填接顶率开始，按5%递增梯度构建不同充填接顶率的充填体三维模型，运用MIDAS/GTS 有限元软件模拟分析不同接顶率充填体受力状况，提出了考虑抗拉、抗压安全系数和拉应力、压应力集中区域体积的综合安全系数方法，用于评价充填体的稳定性。以某矿山为例的评价结果表明，对于二步进路采场开采，一步进路采场充填体的接顶率和综合安全系数越大，其稳定性越高；当接顶率不足75%时，抗拉、抗压安全系数大于1，综合安全系数小于1，充填体有失稳风险；而当接顶率大于75%时，抗拉、抗压安全系数和综合安全系数均大于1，充填体处于稳定状态，其稳定性满足安全生产要求。
Based on the filling-slurry flowing law and final filling state in the stope, this paper analyzes the stability of filling materials with different roof-contacted filling ratios during the upward filling process. The process was divided into two parts: unlimited diffusion deposition and limited upward stacking. Combined with the final filling state, and beginning with 50% roof-contacted filling ratio, 11 filling models were built with an increasing gradient of 5%. The MIDAS/GTS finite element software was applied to analyze the stress condition of filling materials which had different roof-contacted filling ratios, and the comprehensive safety coefficient was put forward to evaluate the stability of filling materials, including the tensile coefficient, compressive safety coefficient and area size under concentrated stress. Take a specific stope as an example, when the roof-contacted filling ratio is under 75% in one-step route stope, the filling material still has the possibility of instability, although the tensile and compressive safety coefficients are higher than 1.0 and the comprehensive safety coefficient is under 1.0. When the roof-contacted filling ratio is above 75%, the tensile, compressive and comprehensive safety coefficients are higher than 1.0, the stability of the filling material reaches a safe level.
[1] 彭士群, 王洪武. 进路充填采矿法充填技术探讨[J]. 中国矿山工程, 2004, 33 (3):30-33 Peng Shiqun, Wang Hongwu. Discussion of technology of upward approach and filling mining method[J]. China Mine Engineering, 2004, 33 (3): 30-33
[2] 韩斌. 金川二矿区充填体可靠度分析与1#矿体回采地压控制优化研 究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2004: 42-61. Han Bin. Reliability analysis of backfill of deposit 2 of Jinchuan and pressure control optimization research during 1# deposit mining[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2004: 42-61.
[3] 许新启. 分段充填采矿法充填体稳定性分析及控制[J]. 有色金属,2000, 52(4): 18-22. Xu Xinqi. The stability analysis and control of filling mass of sublevel filling method[J]. Nonferrous Metals, 2000, 52(4): 18-22.
[4] 闫东飞, 马凤山, 赵海军, 等. 甘肃金川二矿区下向进路充填法开采充 填体稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2012, 23(4): 60-64. Yan Dongfei, Ma Fengshan, Zhao Haijun, et al. The stability of filling mass of downward slicing drift mining method of deposit 2 of Jinchuan[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2012, 23(4): 60-64.
[5] 汤丽, 肖卫国. 采场中充填料浆流动规律的研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2005, 25(2): 7-9. Tang Li, Xiao Weiguo. Study on flowing law of fill slurry in stope[J]. Mining R&D, 2005, 25(2): 7-9.
[6] 王新民, 古德生, 张钦礼. 深井矿山充填理论与管道输送技术[M]. 长 沙: 中南大学出版社, 2010. Wang Xinmin, Gu Desheng, Zhang Qinli. Theory of backfilling activity and pipeline transportation technology of backfill in deep mines[M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 2010.
[7] 卢央泽, 李丽君, 姜仁义. 关于提高充填接顶率的若干问题探讨[J]. 有 色金属, 2009, 61(3): 6-8. Lu Yangze, Li Lijun, Jiang Renyi. Discussion on raising the rate of supporting pit roof[J]. Nonferrous Metal, 2009, 61(3): 6-8.
[8] 李洪兵, 谷新建, 宋嘉栋, 等. 郑家坡铁矿隔水矿柱厚度的确定[J]. 矿业 工程研究, 2013, 28(3): 34-38. Li Hongbing, Gu Xinjian, Song Jiadong, et al. Determination of thickness of waterproof pillar of Zhengjiapo iron mine[J]. Mineral Engineering Research, 2013, 28(3): 34-38.
[9] 张钦礼, 罗怡波, 柯俞贤. 露天转地下开采地表沉降安全性分析[J]. 中 南大学学报, 2013, 44(8): 3441-3445. Zhang Qinli, Luo Yibo, Ke Yuxian. Security for ground settlement of transition from open pit to underground mining[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 44(8): 3441-3445.
[10] 周先贵, 曹金国. 岩土力学数值方法研究进展[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2002,29(8): 15-18. Zhou Xiangui, Cao Jinguo. Advance in research on numerical methods of rock-soil mechanics[J]. Building Technique Development, 2002, 29 (8): 15-18.
[11] 侯恩科, 吴立新, 李建明, 等. 三维地学模拟与数值模拟的耦合方法 研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2002, 27(4): 388-392. Hou Enke, Wu Lixin, Li Jianming, et al. Study on the coupling of 3D geoscience modeling with numerical simulation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society. 2002, 27(4): 388-392.
[12] 李明超, 钟登华, 秦朝霞, 等. 基于三维地质模型的工程岩体结构精 细数值建模[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(9): 1893-1898. Li Mingchao, Zhong Denghua, Qin Zhaoxia, et al. Refined modeling for numerical simulation of engineering rock mass structures based on 3D geological model[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(9): 1893-1898.
[13] 廖异, 曾祥国. Hoek-Brown岩体非线性强度的线性化方法[J]. 中南 大学学报, 2012, 43(12): 205-210. Liao Yi, Zeng Xiangguo. Linearization method of non-linear strength of Hoek-Brown rocks mass[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 43(12): 205-210.
[14] 蒋青青. 基于Hoek-Brown准则点安全系数的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 中 南大学学报, 2009, 40(3): 786-790. Jiang Qingqing. Stability of point safety factor of slope based on Hoek-Brown criterion[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2009.40(3): 786-790.
[15] Priest S D. Determination of shear strength and three-dimensional yield strength for the Hoek-Brown criterion[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Enineering, 2005, 38(4): 299-327.
[16] 曹平, 邓志斌, 陈枫. 边坡稳定性任意条分发中安全系数的计算[J]. 中南大学学报, 2005, 36(2): 302-306. Cao Ping, Deng Zhibin, Chen Feng. Calculation of safety factor for slope stability analysis with polygon elements[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2005, 36(2): 302-306.
[17] 郑颖人, 赵尚毅. 边(滑)坡工程设计中安全系数的讨论[J]. 岩石力学 与工程学报, 2006, 25(9): 1937-1940. Zheng Yingren, Zhao Shangyi. Discussion on safety factors of slope and landslide engineering design[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(9): 1937-1940.
[18] 林杭, 曹平, 李江腾. 基于广义Hoek-Brown 准则的边坡安全系数间 接解法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(10): 1147-1151. Lin Hang, Cao Ping, Li Jiangteng. The indirect calculation method for the safety factor of slope based on generalized Hoek-Brown criterion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(10): 1147-1151.
